What if we gave a party for the most talented and no one showed?

As human resource professionals, we are charged with finding the most talented candidates to fill the positions within our organizations. But what would you do if the most talented are not available to you? 

Dr. Richard Florida in his book, "Flight of the Creative Class" suggests that the talent assets are choosing to go elsewhere then this country. We are in the middle of reading the companion volume to the movie "Waiting for Superman" and in today's newspaper was an article from the The Atlantic entitled "Your Child Left Behind."

Each of these resources suggest that the educational system within the US is turning out substandard talent for our business environment. Let's leave your silo for a moment and say that they are correct, what are you going to do when you throw the party to attract the top quality talent for our human capital needs and you can't find them?

Unless you are living life as an ostrich , with your head in the sand, you know that as we come out of this trying economic times we are in, the better employee is going to consider leaving for supposedly greener pastures. If Your Child Left behind is correct the only state that comes close to being in the top 18 state or countries for 15 year olds performing at the advanced level in math proficiency was Massachusetts. This means as we search for replacement human capital we can't find them.

So as we begin the final week of 2010 and begin 2011, we as human resource professionals need to take the initiative to help our local schools gain the lead back for this country. There are many suggestions around on how to resolve this issue. But we would suggest that while dramatic changes are needed we need to do with reason in mind. The transition team for the new governor of the State of Florida has suggested letting parents remove their children from classrooms where the parent feels the teacher is being ineffective. Is this ineffective by actual data or based on the beliefs of the parent? We need to ensure that the talent of the future knows how to think critically about the issues confronting our organizations.

Here are some thoughts for consideration.

• As the vehicle for introducing talent to our organizations, we need to let the educational institutions know what the voice of the customer is, by informing them of the criteria for employment that our organizations have established.
• As Human Resource professionals we should actively work with local educators to ensure that the talent that they are producing know how to use the critical thinking skills that is required of our cross-functional teams in today's organizations.
• As Human resource professionals we are accustom to completing SWOT analysis of our policies and procedures. We should do the same thing  with the local educational programs as they relate to our talent needs. Following the SWOT it is imperative that we are not bystanders but forward thinking professionals by showing how the SWOT can improve our schools.
• We need to benchmark what our colleagues are doing in other sections of the country and use the data to guide our local schools to implement what is working with other corporations.
• If we have some concrete ideas about how to invent some break through strategies for improving the status of our students in the world of the future, we need to be prepared to share it with the world.

In final thoughts, we need to be bold about becoming involved int he future of our educational initiatives or we will be destined to throwing the party with no one in attendance.

Have some other ideas? Share them with us. Share them with your colleagues. Share them with your organizational management. Share them with your educational leadership. Be part of the solution not a bystander.

Posted via email from hrstrategist@Net-Speed

Deoartment of Labor releases guidance on Lactation Rule

In a legal alert from Fisher and Phiilps :

The U.S. Labor Department has now published what it calls its "preliminary interpretations" and a request for information regarding the federal Fair Labor Standards Act lactation-break amendment we wrote about in April and July.  The deadline for submitting information and comments is February 22, 2011.  Employers should give serious consideration to weighing-in on these "preliminary interpretations".

The material says that the "reasonable break time" required should be evaluated according to individualized considerations of both the time spent expressing milk and "steps reasonably necessary" to that activity.  In DOL's view, the length of a required break will depend upon a variety of things, like:

•   How much time it takes to express the milk (DOL anticipates 15 to 20 minutes),

•   Time spent walking to and from the break location, and any time waiting to use the space,

•   Time spent retrieving, unpacking, and setting-up a pump and related supplies,

•   The efficiency of the pump,

•   Time spent in washing, in cleaning the pump and attachments, and in any related steps, taking into account whether there is a sink with running water nearby, and

•   Time spent storing the milk in a safe manner.

As for the frequency and number of breaks, DOL will consider factors such as:

•   The baby's age as this relates to the child's feeding needs,

•   The number of feedings in the baby's normal daily schedule,

•   Whether the baby is eating solid food, and

•   How often the baby usually nurses.

DOL anticipates that the number of necessary breaks will "typically" be two or three during an eight-hour shift (and possibly more for longer shifts).  Apparently, then, DOL would not consider total breaktime of, say, 45 to 90 minutes each workday to be out of the ordinary.  DOL also says that these breaks might not track the employee's regular break times or meal periods.

According to DOL, employers are required to make a suitable room available for use "where practicable" (although this room need not necessarily be a permanent space dedicated to that purpose).  If it is not "practicable" to do so, the employer must "create a space with partitions or curtains" that is also otherwise appropriate under the amendment.  DOL says that employers are not complying with the break requirement if the space is so far from the employee that it is "impractical" for her to take the breaks, or if the number of employees needing to use the space means that this "prevents" an employee from taking breaks or "necessitates a prolonged waiting time".

DOL continues to "interpret" the amendment to mean that:

♦   An employer allowing paid breaks must compensate a nursing employee in the same way it does others if she uses such a break in order to express breastmilk; and

♦   The break must be treated as worktime if the employee is not "completely relieved from duty" (apparently ascribing this to a non-existent "general requirement" in the FLSA itself).

For a variety of reasons, both the correctness of these positions under the FLSA and DOL's authority to propound them are subject to serious question.  Nonetheless, DOL clearly intends to impose them.

These "preliminary interpretations" touch upon and seek input with respect to other subjects also, such as:

•   Whether and under what circumstances managers' offices, locker rooms, utility closets, storage spaces, or anterooms or lounges associated with bathrooms might be adequate break spaces,

•   What approaches there might be to situations in which employees (such as drivers) do not perform their jobs at a fixed place of work,

•   How to comply with the requirement when an employee works at a client's or customer's place of business,

•   How the employer is to be notified about the employee's intention to take lactation breaks (including whether a "simple conversation" should suffice), and

•   How the under-50-employee "undue hardship" exemption will apply (indications are that DOL intends to construe it very restrictively).

Although this latest release is couched as a request for public comment for DOL's use in "formulating further guidance", there is some hint that instead it might actually be DOL's last pronouncement on the subject for the foreseeable future.  Moreover, DOL states that it does not intend to issue regulations "[a]t this time" (it is not apparent by what authority DOL would do so in the absence of any empowering language in the amendment itself).  Even so, employers ought to study these materials carefully and should submit their reactions and any suggestions or objections.  For one thing, a muted response risks a later argument that the "regulated community" tacitly embraced DOL's views in their entirety.

Posted via email from hrstrategist@Net-Speed

Relocation Announcement

SunCoke Energy will relocate its headquarters from Knoxville, Tennessee, to west suburban Lisle, IL

Posted via email from hrstrategist@Net-Speed

Talent Shortage is Real

Wolters Kluwer Employment and Law Business Notice today carried the following notice:

Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE

Companies worldwide view talent as biggest obstacle to future growth, Towers Watson finds

As companies worldwide begin to position themselves for future growth in the face of an uncertain economic recovery, a new Towers Watson survey finds that concerns over their ability to attract and retain key talent, or to plan for an orderly replacement of talent, could thwart those efforts. The survey also found significant gaps in employers' capabilities to address talent management and succession planning issues. The Strategies for Growth survey of more than 700 companies globally, revealed that talent—finding it and keeping it—is the biggest potential workforce obstacle to achieving growth.

Posted via email from hrstrategist@Net-Speed

Reflections on 2010 and perspective on 2011

The past year has been one of twists nad turns that has brought us to a diferent place then I have been in before. We thank our clients and partners for the path we have now finding ourselves walking. Give me the liberty of pondering verbally on some of these changes:

1) After a three year effort ot find a full time position, a number of organizations stated that I was not of interest because my background said consultant. We during the past six months made the decision that if I could not beat them then I might as well join them. In April we turned our efforts full time to becoming the very best consultant to our lcients that I could.

2) Along this path we have had the priviledge of meeting some phenomenol individuals who bring some really neat skills to the human capital arena. In advance I apologize if I miss anyone, but here are the individuals who really stand out in my quest:

Trisha MacFarlane - I had the privledge to meet Trish at the HR Florida conference. Trish is the owner of HR Ringleader which I look forward to reading each and every day for her insights on this great profession we have entered into. There has not been a single opportunity when Trish has not been willing to provide feedback on my social media efforts. The guidance is most appreciated.

Kathy Potts - Kathy conducts a program regarding how to play the game and being in control of the environment you function in. Kathy was willing to take time out of her busy schedule to sit down and review our marketing efforts and talk with us about what we needed to do to successfuly walk the new path we were beginning to tread down. Her advice has been right to the point.

Michael VanDevort - The social media guru who has been instrumental in opening some doors for us and been a sounding board on our own social media endeavors.

Barry Brown - I have known Barry and his wife Angel for many years and they both have been a source for guidance in areas of HR that I have not been involved in before. They have also been the source of mem bers of our client family. Barry and Angel than you for the years of being the support platform for our consulting practice.

Bill Mazurek - Bill began as our instructor for the six sigma black belt training and has become a valuable counselor and if I may take the liberty, a friend. We appreciate his efforts to take us to the next level in our work in the continous improvement field.

Larry Labelle - Larry during the past year has provided ongoing guidance about business intelligence and been a reliable resource to bounce ideas off.

Owner of My LinkingPowerForum Vincent has been a wealthof guidance into the way to grow our business and we treasure his advice and friendship.

3) One of our direction sis to provide a network of partners who can complement the services of DBAI with areas of expertise we don't have readily available. In the past year we have added several organizations to our partner list. We appreciate your contributions toour services package:

Suddath Van Lines - Part of the Unigroup company of moving companies, they have been both a partner but also a member of our client family.

BenePay Online - Working in the marketplace with small to medium sized organizations we knew that we needed a quality provider for electronic  benefit and payroll services. BenePay has been the perfect fit. They have a quality program and have already worked to make this a two way relationship by providing leads for organizations that might need our services. In addition we will be providing HR services to their clients as needed.

Alessandra and Associates - For a number of years we have been a distributor for the materials of Tony Alessandra who we highly recommend to anyone who is looking for a dynamic presentor for corporate meetings. In 2010, on our partner page we have provided a link to the online assessment catalog with over 40 assessments to improve corporate perofrmance.

4) The year 2011 is beginning to look promising for a very busy year. Our The Ultimate IMprovement Cycle: A Six Sigma Approach to Human Capital Management is gaining some very strong interest nationwide with possible presentations in about five different cities. We intend to get mor einvolved with the Economic Gardening effort across the region, It is the route to get us out of the doldrums we are in.

No matter what your beliefs, may you celebrate the ned of one year and the beginning of a new one with joy and happiness for yourself and those closest to you. I look forward to more interaction between our organizations inthe coming year. If we can be of any assistance, please let us know.

Happy Holiday wishes

Posted via email from hrstrategist@Net-Speed

Race to Nowhere

As I do typically every morning I watch a portion of the Today show before getting on the computer. This morning they had a segment with the documentary producer who create a film that is making a stir across this country. The premise behind the film entitled Race to Nowhere" is that we are loading our youth with so much pressure to get into this college or that college that they can never achieve the goal. They discussed a 13 year old girl who failed to get an A on a math test and was so stressed out over it that she committed suicide.

I took a moment to carry this out a little further and asked myself if we are doing this to our kids, then they must have gotten this "drive" from somewhere and the natural thought is that it is coming from peers, teachers and parents. If in fact it in part comes from their parents and teachers, then does this race carry over to the workplace?

We all are cognizant of the fact that we function in an ever increasingly competitive global workplace. I realize it is a fact of life. But in an effort to be better than everyone else, do we equally place this urge to race to nowhere on our employees? Do we as managers walk the walk,and talk the talk that every employee must reach this lofty goal which maybe unattainable?

While our organizations need to remain competitive, it is equally true that we as business owners and human resource professionals must recognize that not every employee is capable or wants to be in the "Harvard" of the business world. Some can make equally important contributions to the health of the organization without being in the ivory tower of the organization. The employee could be the one on the floor who sees that we are doing something that is not totally beneficial to the organization and alerts management to a better way of doing things. The employee could be the one who in exposure to our customers enhances the relationship by going the extra mile to solve a problem. The employee could be the one who by being active in the local community extends the brand name of the organization by showing that the organization cares about the community in which they thrive.

 Competitiveness for the sake of competitiveness may look good on paper but it is not necessarily good for the health of the organization or its greatest asset - your employees

Posted via email from hrstrategist@Net-Speed

On the road to perfection have we lost our way?

Return for a minute with me to the late 60's. I know if you remember the period you were supposedly not part of the time period.But it was a time when the way we taught our next generation was different then today. I cam out of college in this era and taught for six years. I still correspond with one of my first students, 41 years later. In a recent chat session she made the comment that I was one of the first teachers who made her think about the reasons behind what we do and why.

Russ Moen of Express Personnel makes the argument that when the nature of the business world changed from one based on what we made to what we imagine, the nature of the employee changed from one of being an expense item to being a non-owned corporate asset the central part to success in business was dependent on collaboration and innovation.

I look at the push behind such things as NCLB and realize that today's educators while for the most part do a good job, they fail to teach the skills to enable our next generation of workers to be critical thinkers in the workplace. You can't instill innovation in an individual when you are "teaching" them to prepare for the state accountability exam. Instead we are teaching them to stay within very small parallel views. Where would we end up with a HP or an Apple or even Ford Motor if we told them that they can't operate from the garage as they developed their concept because it did not meet the testing criteria.

I was a bear of a teacher and I readily admit it. I took every opportunity to challenge my students to reach for that next higher level in what they did. We need to do the same with today's workers who come into the workplace by being unable to think beyond what is in front of them. We have not prepared our workplace to view the world from both a macro perspective and at the same time a micro perspective. When was the last time you had an employee come to you and suggest that there maybe a better way to complete a process? In many cases the reason is that they were never taught to think for themselves.

Dr. Richard Florida talks in his books about the role of the Creative Class in the workplace. He suggests that this country's standing in the world is going to be diminished because those who dream instead of producing end results believe they can find a greener pasture elsewhere. It is time we understand the new paradigm and change our educational system to meet the needs of your workplace not whether they performed well on some standardized test dictated by an accountability fanatic sitting in some office away from the workplace/classroom.

Innovation is the way to our recovery. Innovation is the way to the future of the workplace. Innovation is the way to produce contributing members of society. If we don't recognize how to challenge the assumptions made by organizations how do we expect to be innovators in the years to come. I would expect that the next generation will not be as productive as past ones due to the inability to look at problems with a critical mind.

Posted via email from hrstrategist@Net-Speed

Are walking the walk and talking the talk?

A recent new article about the congressional gridlock gave me a moment to pause to reflect on what goes on in our corporate environments. Every year since September 11 we have held memorial events to honor those who lost their lives in the twin towers. On the face of it we are honoring not only the victims but the many first responders who came to the rescue of those at three sites. Last week the Congressional leaders defeated legislation  which would have covered some of the cost of the health care for those who went into the disaster sites. Are we honoring those who have passed away but not those who lived but were exposed to the debris?

Let's take a look at the corporate environment and see how many times we see a similar scenario happening. A friend of mine has recently taken a job with a company that is noted for its customer service. Management tells their employees that they believe in an open door policy but employees are labeled as a malcontent if they take a problem to the management. What is the affect when you ask your employees to become engaged with your organization, but then through your actions treat them as second class citizens. How do you respond to the employee, who you continual provide feedback telling them how valuable tot he organization they are, but you expect them to put in 70-80 hour weeks because that is the way we do things around here?

Does your actions match your message to not only your employees but your customers?

Posted via email from hrstrategist@Net-Speed

IRS releases 2011 Mileage rates

IR-2010-119, Dec. 3, 2010

WASHINGTON — The Internal Revenue Service today issued the 2011 optional standard mileage rates used to calculate the deductible costs of operating an automobile for business, charitable, medical or moving purposes.
Beginning on Jan. 1, 2011, the standard mileage rates for the use of a car (also vans, pickups or panel trucks) will be:

• 51 cents per mile for business miles driven
• 19 cents per mile driven for medical or moving purposes
• 14 cents per mile driven in service of charitable organizations

The standard mileage rate for business is based on an annual study of the fixed and variable costs of operating an automobile. The rate for medical and moving purposes is based on the variable costs as determined by the same study. Independent contractor Runzheimer International conducted the study.

A taxpayer may not use the business standard mileage rate for a vehicle after using any depreciation method under the Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS) or after claiming a Section 179 deduction for that vehicle. In addition, the business standard mileage rate cannot be used for any vehicle used for hire or for more than four vehicles used simultaneously.

Taxpayers always have the option of calculating the actual costs of using their vehicle rather than using the standard mileage rates.

Posted via email from hrstrategist@Net-Speed

Are we ready for the changed dynamics?

The Wharton School has published an article regarding the affects of the "silver Tsunami" as older workers change their views about retiring. The article can be found at http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=2644

 

Posted via email from hrstrategist@Net-Speed

Have we missed the directions?

One of the business magazines I read religiously from cover to cover each month is the latest edition of Fast Company Magazine. Several years ago in doing so I read an article by Dr. Richard Florida and got hooked on his concepts. His latest book, the Great Reset is no exception.

Then I picked up the St Petersburg Times this morning and the front page contains a larger article across the middle of the page entitled " New Reality in The US: Forever jobless." This lead me to contemplate whether we have missed the direction in which we are headed.

The nature of the workforce has changed but many of our politicians are still walking around with rose colored glasses. Many of our human resource professionals are in the same boat.So how do we need to change direction to resolve the unemployment quagmire we are in?

First, we need to come to the realization that we are no longer in a workplace that is governed by what we make. It is ruled, whether you accept it or not, by what we dream. This means that our way of viewing available talent. There was a reason why the founders of HP and Apple began in their garages.They did so because traditional business did not recognize the value of their ideas.

Second, the current trend to negate the inclusion of candidates who are unemployed means that you may be eliminating the very person who has the concept in his or her head that will catapult your organization to the next level.

Third, Charles Handy in his book "The Age of Paradox" suggested that we would end unemployment by everyone being self-employed. If that is true we need to be concerned where the knowledge bank of our organizations is going reside. Your organization depends on developing that knowledge base and having it available as needed.

While jobs are important and we would not dispute that we need to get as many people back to work as possible, we would also contend that the effort to concentrate on passive candidates is not helping the unemployment issue nor your organization.

Posted via email from hrstrategist@Net-Speed

Cooley Godward and Kronish post mimum compensation rates for 2011

Ther law firm of Cooley, Godward and Kronish posted on their legal blog the minimum compensation rates for the coming year:

2011 Minimum Compensation Rates

New Year Brings Few Changes in Minimum Compensation Rates

Employers should review compensation rates for both exempt and nonexempt employees to ensure compliance with current legal thresholds. Set forth below are rates at the federal level, and for some states and localities, that apply to the most common job categories.

The following minimum compensation rates are effective as of January 1, 2011:
JURISDICTION	EXEMPTION	MINIMUM COMPENSATION
FEDERAL	Nonexempt	$7.25/hour
	Executive	$455/week1 on salary basis
	Professional or Administrative	$455/week on salary or fee basis
	Computer	$27.63/hour (no change from 2010)
	Highly Compensated	$100,000 total compensation (including minimum $455 minimum weekly salary or fee)
	Licensed practicing medical doctor or attorney; teacher	None
	Business Owner (20% minimum equity and engaged in management)	None
	Outside sales	None
In the following jurisdictions, higher rates prevail as shown. Not all states are reflected.
CALIFORNIA	Nonexempt	$8.00/hour $9.79/hour (San Francisco) (increase from 2010)
	Executive, professional or administrative	$2,773.33/month on salary basis
	Computer	$37.94/hour, $6,587.50/month or $79,050/year
	Licensed Physician	$69.13/hour
COLORADO	Nonexempt	$7.36/hour (still proposed; not final) (increase from 2010)
MASSACHUSETTS	Nonexempt	$8.00/hour
NEW YORK	Nonexempt	$7.25/hour
WASHINGTON, DC	Nonexempt	$8.25/hour
WASHINGTON STATE	Nonexempt	$8.67/hour (increase from 2010)
	Outside Sales Exemption	guaranteed salary, commission, or fee

Posted via email from hrstrategist@Net-Speed